D’Alembert System in Trading

Contributor Image
Written By
Contributor Image
Written By
Dan Buckley
Dan Buckley is an US-based trader, consultant, and part-time writer with a background in macroeconomics and mathematical finance. He trades and writes about a variety of asset classes, including equities, fixed income, commodities, currencies, and interest rates. As a writer, his goal is to explain trading and finance concepts in levels of detail that could appeal to a range of audiences, from novice traders to those with more experienced backgrounds.
Updated

The D’Alembert System is a betting strategy with applications in trading. 

Named after the French mathematician Jean-Baptiste le Rond d’Alembert, this system is based on the principle of equilibrium in nature. 

While originally designed for traditional betting games like roulette or sports betting, it’s found applications in various forms of financial markets trading.

 


Key Takeaways – D’Alembert System in Trading

  • Gradual Risk Adjustment
    • The D’Alembert System increases trade size after losses and decreases it after wins.
    • It’s primarily designed for betting approaches with binary outcomes.
    • Better promotes a controlled, step-by-step approach to risk than aggressive Martingale patterns.
  • Psychological Discipline
    • The structured progression helps traders maintain discipline, and can help reduce the likelihood of emotional decision-making.
  • Limited Drawdown Risk
    • While less aggressive than systems like Martingale, prolonged losing streaks can still lead to large drawdowns.
  • Dependence on Capital
    • The system requires sufficient starting capital to withstand consecutive losses without depleting the trading account.

 

Basic Principles of the D’Alembert System

The Concept of Balance

The fundamental idea behind the D’Alembert System is that nature tends to seek balance. 

For traditional betting games, this translates to the belief that wins and losses should eventually even out over time.

Progressive Betting

Unlike some other betting systems, the D’Alembert System uses a more conservative approach to progressive betting. 

It involves increasing or decreasing bets based on the outcome of previous bets, but with smaller increments compared to more aggressive systems like the Martingale.

 

How the D’Alembert System Works

Starting the Sequence

  1. Choose a base unit for betting (e.g., $10)
  2. Begin with a bet equal to one unit

After a Loss

If you lose a bet, increase your next bet by one unit. 

This is based on the assumption that a win is “due” to happen soon.

After a Win

If you win a bet, decrease your next bet by one unit. 

This is done to protect your winnings and reduce risk.

Reaching Equilibrium

The goal is to reach a point where the number of wins equals the number of losses, theoretically resulting in a profit equal to the number of bets made.

 

D’Alembert System vs. Martingale System

For example, if a trader is betting $100, a loss would dictate that both the Martingale bettor and D’Alembert player would both move up to $200 for the subsequent bet.

If they lose again, the Martingale bettor would move up to $300 to make back what they’ve lost ($100 + $200). The D’Alembert bettor would likewise do $300 because it’s simply the next step up ($200 + their $100 bet size).

However, on the third loss, they would differ.

They’ve both lost $600 total.

So the Martingale bettor would bet $600, but the D’Alembert bettor would move up to $400 – $300 (previous bet size) + $100 (their increment).

 

Applying the D’Alembert System to Trading

Adapting the System for Financial Markets

While the D’Alembert System was originally designed for binary outcomes in gambling, it can be adapted for use in financial trading:

  1. Define a base unit for your trades (e.g., $1,000)
  2. Use market analysis and overall trading strategy to determine entry points
  3. Apply the D’Alembert progression to your position sizes as you trade

Example in Currency Trading

The D’Alembert System best fits with binary outcome trading, such as binary options.

Let’s say you’re trading currency pairs with binaries:

  1. Start with a $1,000 position
  2. If the trade is unsuccessful, increase the next position to $2,000
  3. If that trade is successful, reduce the following position to $1,000

Application in Stock Trading

The system can also be applied to stock trading:

  1. Begin with a certain number of shares as your base unit
  2. Increase or decrease the number of shares traded based on previous outcomes
  3. Use stop-loss orders to limit potential losses
  4. For longer-duration trading styles, consider options due to markets’ ability to gap when they close overnight or over weekends and holidays

 

Advantages of the D’Alembert System in Trading

Risk Management

Compared to more aggressive betting systems, the D’Alembert System offers better risk management

The gradual increase in position size helps to reduce large losses.

Psychological Benefits

A betting strategy that’s more systematic can help traders maintain discipline and avoid emotional decision-making. 

By following a predetermined plan, traders are less likely to make impulsive trades based on fear or greed.

 

Limitations and Risks

No Guarantee of Profit

Like all trading systems, the D’Alembert System doesn’t guarantee anything. 

Markets can experience prolonged trends that may result in consecutive losses, which can cause losses to build.

Potential for Significant Drawdowns

While less risky than some other systems, a long streak of losses can still lead to substantial drawdowns in your trading account.

Dependency on Starting Capital

The effectiveness of the system depends on having sufficient capital to withstand a series of losses without exhausting your funds.

 

Modifications and Enhancements

Setting Upper Limits

Implementing a maximum bet size can help prevent excessive risk during losing streaks.

For example, if a trader is using $100 per trade, they can institute a maximum size of $300 per trade such that elongated win streaks aren’t damaging.

Adjusting the Progression

Some traders modify the system by using different increments for increasing and decreasing bets, based on their risk tolerance and market conditions.

Related:

 

Comparison with Other Trading Systems

D’Alembert vs. Martingale

As we covered earlier, the D’Alembert System is generally considered less risky than the Martingale System, which doubles the bet after each loss. 

Nonetheless, it also has a lower potential for quick recovery after a losing streak.

D’Alembert vs. Fibonacci

Compared to the Fibonacci betting system, which uses the Fibonacci sequence for bet sizing, the D’Alembert System is simpler to implement due to the fixed increment.

 

Conclusion – Is the D’Alembert System Suitable for Trading?

The D’Alembert System offers a structured approach to position sizing in trading.

This comes with potential benefits for risk management and psychological discipline. 

However, no trading system is foolproof, and the D’Alembert System has its limitations, such as being a better potential fit for trading approaches with more discrete outcomes (e.g., binary options).

Before implementing this or any other trading system, consider the following:

  1. Your risk tolerance and financial goals
  2. The characteristics of the markets you’re trading (i.e., better fit with binary outcomes than continuous, unconstrained outcomes)
  3. Your overall trading strategy and analysis methods
  4. The size of your trading account relative to your base unit

Ultimately, the D’Alembert System should be viewed as one strategy among many, and something that can expand one’s horizons of the range of philosophies that are out there. 

Above all, most important is market analysis, sound risk management practices, and a well-rounded trading education. 

As with any trading strategy, it’s advisable to test the D’Alembert System thoroughly in a demo account before risking real capital if choosing to try it out.