7+ Companies With a Dual Share Class
Several companies have dual or multiple share classes.
Here are some notable examples:
GOOG vs. GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. (formerly Google Inc.) has two publicly traded share classes.
GOOG represents Class C shares (no voting rights), while GOOGL represents Class A shares (one vote per share).
BRK.A vs. BRK.B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. has two share classes.
BRK.A represents Class A shares, which have more voting rights and are much more expensive.
BRK.B represents Class B shares, which have fewer voting rights and are more affordable.
META (formerly FB)
Facebook, Inc. (now known as Meta Platforms, Inc.) has Class A and Class B shares.
META represents Class A shares (one vote per share), while Class B shares, which are not publicly traded, have 10 votes per share.
NWSA vs. NWS
News Corp has two share classes.
NWSA represents Class A shares (no voting rights), while NWS represents Class B shares (one vote per share).
LBTYA vs. LBTYK
Liberty Global plc has multiple share classes.
LBTYA represents Class A shares.
LBTYK represents Class C shares (no voting rights).
VIACA vs. VIAC
ViacomCBS Inc. has two share classes.
VIACA represents Class A shares (one vote per share).
VIAC represents Class B shares (no voting rights).
UA vs. UAA
Under Armour, Inc. has two share classes.
UA represents Class C shares (no voting rights).
UAA represents Class A shares (one vote per share).
FOX vs. FOXA
Fox Corporation has two share classes.
FOX represents Class B shares (one vote per share).
FOXA represents Class A shares (no voting rights).
FAQ – Dual Share Class
Why do some companies have dual share classes?
Some companies have dual share classes to maintain control and decision-making power within the founding team or certain shareholders, while still raising capital.
This structure allows different voting rights for different classes, ensuring that strategic decisions remain with core stakeholders even as new investors come in.
Many companies want to go public for fundraising purposes but don’t want the company controlled by an outside investor, especially one that is less knowledgeable about what the best decisions are.